IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/ijllcs/v1y2025i1p48-54.html

The Effects of Content-Based Instruction (CBI) on College Students' Writing Competence

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Min

Abstract

This study explores the impact of Content-Based Instruction (CBI) on enhancing college students' English writing skills. The goal was to investigate how integrating subject content into language learning can improve both linguistic ability and academic writing proficiency. An action research approach was used, with data collected through questionnaires and writing tests. One hundred and twenty freshmen from a local university in Changchun participated. The findings showed that CBI significantly improved students' overall writing skills, particularly in areas such as text coherence and organization. By engaging with authentic, content-driven tasks, students demonstrated improved ability to structure their writing according to Western academic conventions. This process helped students shift from native language (L1) thinking patterns to the more linear, logical writing structures common in English academic discourse. Additionally, CBI had a positive impact on students' writing attitudes and strategies. Students reported greater confidence in their writing, with improvements in self-assessment and revision skills. They also developed a broader range of writing strategies, including outlining and peer review, which helped reduce common writing difficulties such as structural confusion and writer's block. Overall, CBI proved effective not only in enhancing students' linguistic skills but also in fostering cognitive flexibility, preparing them for academic writing challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Min, 2025. "The Effects of Content-Based Instruction (CBI) on College Students' Writing Competence," International Journal of Literature, Linguistics, and Cultural Studies, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 1(1), pages 48-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:dba:ijllcs:v:1:y:2025:i:1:p:48-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/IJLLCS/article/view/258/265
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:ijllcs:v:1:y:2025:i:1:p:48-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/IJLLCS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.