Author
Abstract
Cyber-physical systems operating in safety-critical domains increasingly rely on autonomous coordination, yet their opacity during internal conflicts poses serious risks to human operators, patients, and infrastructure. This paper introduces the Human-in-the-Loop Conflict Resolution (HITL-CR) framework---a principled, interdisciplinary approach that unifies control-theoretic conflict detection, explainability-aware decision justification, and cognitively grounded escalation protocols. Rather than treating explainability as a post-hoc add-on or focusing solely on model transparency, HITL-CR embeds interpretability directly into the conflict resolution lifecycle. It defines clear architectural layers for detecting inconsistencies among agents---whether in sensor readings, actuator commands, goal states, or timing constraints---and couples each detection with a domain-grounded, natural-language explanation calibrated to system confidence. Crucially, escalation to human operators is not triggered by conflict severity alone, but by a dual-threshold logic that also evaluates whether the system can reliably justify its reasoning. When explanation fidelity degrades below an operationally validated threshold, the framework initiates graded, context-sensitive handover procedures designed to preserve situation awareness and avoid alert fatigue. The framework draws from formal methods in hybrid systems, real-time explainable AI techniques suitable for embedded deployment, and empirical human factors research on trust calibration and cognitive workload. Its design is validated through a surgical robotics case study and cross-domain analysis spanning autonomous driving, smart grids, and industrial automation. Results demonstrate improved operator comprehension, reduced unnecessary interventions, and more timely, justified human engagement. While challenges remain---including real-time explanation overhead and certification pathways---the HITL-CR framework advances a shift from opaque autonomy toward accountable, auditable, and human-centered cyber-physical orchestration.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:gjsiaa:v:3:y:2026:i:1:p:16-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/GJSI .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.