IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/ejacia/v2y2026i2p47-53.html

Research on Measuring User Behavior Response Differences Supported by Propensity Scoring Method

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Zhimeng

Abstract

Measuring the differences in user behavior responses is increasingly crucial for identifying targeted intervention effects and improving overall digital platform operation in the era of big data. However, observational studies often face significant methodological challenges. To overcome the profound influence of user characteristic differences, inherent sample selection bias, and unobserved confounding factors, the propensity score method is systematically utilized to construct a robust measurement system. This study meticulously classifies users based on the specific type of behavior response and deeply explores the empirical possibility of applying this advanced statistical approach in complex groups that were not randomly sampled. A comprehensive and complete model is constructed around critical methodological issues, including the precise selection of dependent variables, the rigorous elimination of covariates, the accurate estimation of propensity scores, and the implementation of advanced sample matching and weighting techniques. Furthermore, analytical methods such as inter-group comparison, heterogeneity testing, and extensive robustness testing are adopted to significantly enhance the accuracy, reliability, and persuasiveness of the measurement results. Ultimately, this research provides vital technical support and actionable insights for platform administrators and marketers in identifying nuanced behavioral characteristics, rigorously evaluating marketing intervention effects, and strategically optimizing enterprise operations for sustainable growth and improved user engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Zhimeng, 2026. "Research on Measuring User Behavior Response Differences Supported by Propensity Scoring Method," European Journal of AI, Computing & Informatics, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 2(2), pages 47-53.
  • Handle: RePEc:dba:ejacia:v:2:y:2026:i:2:p:47-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/EJACI/article/view/723/694
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:ejacia:v:2:y:2026:i:2:p:47-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/EJACI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.