IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/ejacia/v2y2026i1p31-46.html

Study on Risk Assessment Methods and Multi-Dimensional Control Mechanisms in AI Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Cheong, Chong Lam

Abstract

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) rapidly transitions from experimental prototypes to critical infrastructure, the historical "Performance-First" paradigm has left systems inherently vulnerable to adversarial attacks and data manipulation. This dissertation addresses the critical lack of standardized, quantitative methods for managing these risks by introducing the Risk Assessment Model for AI (RAM-AI). Utilizing a dual-domain simulation approach across Computer Vision and Financial datasets, the study empirically quantifies the "robustness boundary" of deep learning models. The findings reveal that single-layer defenses are inadequate; specifically, models exhibit "Data Hypersensitivity," suffering non-linear performance collapse under data poisoning rates as low as 3%. Furthermore, standard accuracy metrics fail to detect high-confidence evasion attacks. To mitigate these vulnerabilities, the research validates a Multi-dimensional Control Framework that integrates technical safeguards-such as adversarial training and input sanitization-with procedural governance, including Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) protocols. The results demonstrate that this Defense-in-Depth architecture significantly recovers system integrity, reducing critical error rates by 88% in high-stakes scenarios, and offers a strategic playbook for Enterprise Risk Management in the era of emerging AI regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheong, Chong Lam, 2026. "Study on Risk Assessment Methods and Multi-Dimensional Control Mechanisms in AI Systems," European Journal of AI, Computing & Informatics, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 2(1), pages 31-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:dba:ejacia:v:2:y:2026:i:1:p:31-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/EJACI/article/view/457/456
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:ejacia:v:2:y:2026:i:1:p:31-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/EJACI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.