IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/daw/ijsrmt/v4y2025i8p124-135id744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Evaluation of Effect of Conventional Processing Techniques on the Nutritional Quality of Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum)

Author

Listed:
  • Faseeha Muqadus

  • Rabia Batool

  • Iqra Muneer

  • Ahmad Raza

  • Fraz Ahmad

  • Dr. Ali Hassan

Abstract

Tomato is a highly nutritious fruit. Different processing methods are used to keep its quality attributes. In this study, the effect of four processing methods was assessed on the quality aspects of cherry tomatoes. 5 batches were prepared. First batch was control while the second, third, fourth, and fifth batches were subjected to the processes of drying, blanching, frying and freezing, respectively. After processing the tomatoes, proximate analyses were carried out through standard analytical methods. The results showed that moisture contents were highest in blanched samples and lowest in the dried samples. Ash contents were almost same in all the samples.There was not a prominent difference between crude fiber contents of all processed samples. The crude protein percentage was 12.77% in blanched samples while frozen samples had the lowest percentage, i.e., 1.95%. Crude fat contents were highest in fried samples and lowest in frozen sample. The dried tomato samples had highest carbohydrate content and frozen sample had lowest. The results of the study represented that blanching is comparatively better method to preserve the moisture, ash, fiber and protein contents while to preserve fat and carbohydrate contents, drying and frying are the comparatively better methods, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Faseeha Muqadus & Rabia Batool & Iqra Muneer & Ahmad Raza & Fraz Ahmad & Dr. Ali Hassan, 2025. "Comparative Evaluation of Effect of Conventional Processing Techniques on the Nutritional Quality of Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum)," International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, Prasu Publications, vol. 4(8), pages 124-135.
  • Handle: RePEc:daw:ijsrmt:v:4:y:2025:i:8:p:124-135:id:744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijsrmt.com/index.php/ijsrmt/article/view/744
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:daw:ijsrmt:v:4:y:2025:i:8:p:124-135:id:744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rahul Goyal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrmt.com/index.php/ijsrmt/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.