IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/das/njaigs/v8y2025i02p111-125id393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Predictive Accuracy: A Comparative Study of Modern Machine Learning Algorithms in Real-World Datasets

Author

Listed:
  • Subhash Chandra Bose Naripeddy
  • Viswanadha Raju Thotakura

Abstract

In recent years, the application of machine learning (ML) algorithms has grown exponentially across industries due to their ability to derive insights and make predictions from complex data. This study presents a comparative analysis of several widely used machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting, k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), and Deep Neural Networks. Using diverse real-world datasets from healthcare, finance, and social media domains, the performance of each algorithm is evaluated based on predictive accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and computational efficiency. The results reveal how data characteristics, such as feature dimensionality, class imbalance, and noise, affect model performance. Recommendations are provided on the optimal selection of algorithms for specific dataset types and objectives. This study aims to assist data practitioners and researchers in choosing the most suitable ML models for enhancing predictive capabilities in practical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Subhash Chandra Bose Naripeddy & Viswanadha Raju Thotakura, 2025. "Optimizing Predictive Accuracy: A Comparative Study of Modern Machine Learning Algorithms in Real-World Datasets," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 8(02), pages 111-125.
  • Handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:8:y:2025:i:02:p:111-125:id:393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/article/view/393
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:8:y:2025:i:02:p:111-125:id:393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Open Knowledge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.