IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/das/njaigs/v2y2024i1p396-424id435.html

Comparative Evaluation of Epidural vs. Non-Pharmacological Pain Relief Techniques in Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • KAZI FOYEZA AKTHER

  • SNIGDHA ISLAM

  • DR. MD HOSNE MOBARAK

  • ZAHIDUL MOSTAFA

  • BANASREE ROY URMI

  • TAMANNA AKTER

  • KANIZ FATEMATUZ ZAHURA

Abstract

One of the most severe and complicated types of physiological pain is labour pain, and one must be able to use interventions that promote comfort and maternal and fetal safety. It is a comparative analysis of epidural analgesia versus non-pharmacological pain management in spontaneous vaginal births, which discusses their efficacy, maternal satisfaction, safety, and the implications of the study on the care of the obstetric process at large. The most popular pharmacological intervention type is epidural analgesia, which is able to better manage pain by inhibiting the transmission of nociceptive input through local anesthetic medication placed in the epidural space (Halliday et al., 2022). Nonetheless, it has some adverse effects, including long second-stage labour, hypotension, or even postpartum back pain (Malevic et al., 2019; Cahill et al., 2018). Non-pharmacological methods, in turn, including Lamaze breathing, massage, hydrotherapy, acupuncture, and relaxation techniques, increase maternal coping and maternal satisfaction and do not affect the progression of physiological labour (Kaple and Patil, 2023; Lai et al., 2021). Women are similarly empowered by using these techniques and also low-cost and culturally sensitive models of care (Heim et al., 2022; Zeleke et al., 2021). It indicates that although epidural analgesia is the most effective pain reliever, non-pharmacological pain relief has been shown to increase maternal satisfaction and reduce adverse effects as well as promote a better postpartum recovery (Argawu et al., 2023; Fumagalli et al., 2021). A specially designed, holistic, and personalized strategy involving the integration of pharmacologic accuracy and holistic, supportive care seems to be the best option in the current obstetric practice. It is concluded in the article that informed maternal choice, professional education, and accessibility of both pain management modalities play a major role in improving childbirth and clinical outcomes worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazi Foyeza Akther & Snigdha Islam & Dr. Md Hosne Mobarak & Zahidul Mostafa & Banasree Roy Urmi & Tamanna Akter & Kaniz Fatematuz Zahura, 2024. "Comparative Evaluation of Epidural vs. Non-Pharmacological Pain Relief Techniques in Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 2(1), pages 396-424.
  • Handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:2:y:2024:i:1:p:396-424:id:435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/article/view/435
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:2:y:2024:i:1:p:396-424:id:435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Open Knowledge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.