IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dah/aeqzfk/v66_y2018_i1_q1_p13-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration von Risikoaspekten in operative Planung und Budgetierung: Was unterscheidet mittelständische Familienunternehmen von anderen Unternehmen?

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Ulrich

Abstract

Die operative Planung sowie die Budgetierung werden im Controlling-Schrifttum als klassische Aufgaben von Controllern gesehen. Mittelständische Unternehmen greifen bisher weniger als nicht-mittelständische Unternehmen wie z. B. kapitalmarktorientierte Großkonzerne auf Controlling-Instrumente zurück. Im Bereich der operativen Planung und Budgetierung haben sich die Unterschiede nach jüngsten empirischen Studien jedoch schon beinahe nivelliert. Anders sieht dies für die Berücksichtigung von Risiken - verstanden als Schwankungsbreiten - in Planung und Budgetierung aus. Hier rechnet die Mehrheit der Unternehmen mit sicheren Erwartungswerten. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird die Berücksichtigung von Risikoaspekten in Planung und Budgetierung mittelständischer Unternehmen thematisiert. Als Basis dient eine empirische Studie unter 261 Unternehmen aus dem Jahr 2015. Es zeigt sich, dass insbesondere die Gruppe der Familienunternehmen signifikant seltener als andere Unternehmen Risikoaspekte in Planung und Budgetierung berücksichtigt. / Mainstream management accounting literature views operational planning and budgeting as traditional tasks of management accountants. Small and medium-sized enterprises, however, used to implement less management accounting tools than other companies such as publically traded, large corporations. Concerning operational planning and budgeting, recent empirical studies that these differences may no longer exist. The situation regarding the integration of risk aspects - understood as fluctuations - in operational planning and budgeting is different. The majority of companies still calculate with certain expected values. This paper addresses the representation of risk aspects in operational planning and budgeting of small and medium sized enterprises. It is based on an empirical study among 261 German companies in the year 2015. As a result, it can be shown that family firms differ from other companies with regard to the representation of risk aspects in operational planning and budgeting.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Ulrich, 2018. "Integration von Risikoaspekten in operative Planung und Budgetierung: Was unterscheidet mittelständische Familienunternehmen von anderen Unternehmen?," ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 66(1), pages 13-33.
  • Handle: RePEc:dah:aeqzfk:v66_y2018_i1_q1_p13-33
    DOI: 10.3790/zfke.66.1.13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/zfke.66.1.13
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers (2008 onwards); Pay-per-view access from https://elibrary.duncker-humblot.com/journals/zfke (2008 onwards) and http://www.genios.de (2006 onwards)

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/zfke.66.1.13?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bijedić, Teita & Paschke, Max & Pasing, Philipp & Schröder, Christian, 2018. "Digitalisierungskompetenzen in der Führungsebene im Mittelstand," IfM-Materialien 272, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dah:aeqzfk:v66_y2018_i1_q1_p13-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: E-Publishing-Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.duncker-humblot.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.