IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dah/aeqdbw/v65_y2024_i1_q1_p53-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Lücke zwischen (HR-)Managementforschung und Praxis

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Schmidt
  • Nico Brandes
  • Ludger Voigt
  • Dietrich von der Oelsnitz

Abstract

Die Managementforschung steht oft im Zentrum der Kritik, sich zu wenig mit gesellschaftlich relevanten oder praxisnahen Fragestellungen auseinanderzusetzen. Gleichzeitig lässt sich feststellen, dass die betriebliche Praxis häufig wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse nicht angemessen berücksichtigt. Diese Diskrepanz wird gemeinhin als Kluft oder Lücke zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis betrachtet. In diesem Beitrag werden potenzielle Ursachen für dieses Phänomen erörtert. Darüber hinaus werden Überlegungen zur Überbrückung und Annäherung zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis präsentiert. Trans-Abstract: While management research is often criticized for not sufficiently addressing practical or socially relevant issues, it has also been noted that business practice often does not adequately consider scientific findings. This leads to a perceived gap between academia and practical applications. This article discusses potential underlying causes for this phenomenon. In addition, considerations for bringing science and practice closer together are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Schmidt & Nico Brandes & Ludger Voigt & Dietrich von der Oelsnitz, 2024. "Die Lücke zwischen (HR-)Managementforschung und Praxis," Der Betriebswirt, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 65(1), pages 53-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:dah:aeqdbw:v65_y2024_i1_q1_p53-65
    DOI: 10.3790/dbw.65.1.53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.65.1.53
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers (2010 onwards); Pay-per-view access from https://elibrary.duncker-humblot.com/journals/dbw (2010 onwards) and http://www.genios.de (2006 onwards)
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/dbw.65.1.53?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dah:aeqdbw:v65_y2024_i1_q1_p53-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: E-Publishing-Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.duncker-humblot.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.