IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v5y2025i2p60-70.html

Some aspects of improvement of understanding combat immunity under Ukrainian criminal legislation

Author

Listed:
  • Vadym Khashev
  • Ruben Antonyan

Abstract

The full-scale invasion of russian troops caused the immergence in Ukrainian criminal legislation of new rules, aimed at raising the effectiveness of combating this military aggression. Among these rules one of the key ones is the article 43.1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, regulating the combat immunity. The research paper’s objective was the development of some suggestions concerning interpretation of combat immunity and the improvement of its regulation under Ukrainian criminal legislation. While conducting this research the authors used in particular the following methods: gnoseological, systemic-structural, dialectical, logic-semantic and comparative-legal. Some proposals to improve regulatory framework of circumstances excluding criminal illegality of action stipulated by the Criminal Code of Ukraine were elaborated, as well as interpretation of its some attributes. The suggestion was to exclude the definitions of “ammunitions” and “explosive materials” from the text of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, because under their content they are covered by the understanding of concepts “weapon” and “armament”. It was found that when repelling and deterring armed aggression of the russian federation or aggression of another country, it is permissible to use not only armed force, but also any other force capable of striking the enemy, and it is important that such use complies with the rules of international humanitarian law. They emphasised that actions of military personnel or civilians who used poison or other items or weapons prohibited by international humanitarian law to repel and deter the armed aggression of the russian federation, despite the fact that their actions were aimed at countering the occupiers, are subject to criminal liability under Criminal Code of Ukraine. The authors suggested to seek ways of legal possibility to use stricter, except treacherous ones, means and methods of conducting war against armies of those countries, whose armed forces do not absolutely respect rules of international humanitarian law during warfare. The practical value of this work lies in the fact that its results can be used in further research on combat immunity in criminal law, as well as in the application of certain provisions of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in the practical activities of law enforcement agencies

Suggested Citation

  • Vadym Khashev & Ruben Antonyan, 2025. "Some aspects of improvement of understanding combat immunity under Ukrainian criminal legislation," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 5(2), pages 60-70, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:5:y:2025:i:2:p:60-70
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2025-2-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Philosophy,EconomicsandLawReview_5_2_2025_-60-70.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2025-2-60?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:5:y:2025:i:2:p:60-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.