IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v5y2025i2p36-45.html

Forensic psychological examination with the use of polygraph as a means of proof

Author

Listed:
  • Anatoliy Volobuyev
  • Tetyana Orlova
  • Igor Osyka
  • Dariusz Sielicki

Abstract

The growing international interest in the polygraph, driven by both law enforcement demand and commercial incentives, has led to an overstated perception of its evidentiary value in legal proceedings. The purpose of this paper was to determine, based on the analysis of regulatory legal acts, academic publications, national judicial practice, and European Court of Human Rights decisions, the criteria for using the polygraph in proving as one of the methods of forensic psychological examination. The study applied a range of general scientific and legal research methods, including: the system-structural method for analysing the field of criminal proceedings and the practice of using the polygraph; historical and dialectical methods to examine the evolution of academic approaches to polygraph application; the logical-semantic method to clarify key concepts; and the comparative legal method for analysing national legislation, European Court of Human Rights decisions, and judicial practice. The study led to the following conclusions: forensic psychological examination is a comprehensive psychological study to identify the individual psychological characteristics of a participant in criminal proceedings applying a wide range of methods, one of which may be a polygraph; the decision on the use of a polygraph is made by an expert, taking into consideration technological, legal and ethical aspects; the technological aspect is that the polygraph records only the physiological reactions of the person under examination to certain stimuli, which must be assessed by the expert; the legal aspect is the presence in national legislation of clear provisions regarding the subject of a polygraph examination, the procedure for its conduct (methodology) and assessment criteria; the ethical aspect is the inadmissibility of forced or covert use of a polygraph, which provides for an explanation of the rights of the person and the procedure for obtaining written voluntary consent in accordance with the basic principle of legal proceedings – the right of a person not to testify against him or herself. The formulated provisions on the use of a polygraph are oriented towards practical use by criminal proceedings participants

Suggested Citation

  • Anatoliy Volobuyev & Tetyana Orlova & Igor Osyka & Dariusz Sielicki, 2025. "Forensic psychological examination with the use of polygraph as a means of proof," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 5(2), pages 36-45, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:5:y:2025:i:2:p:36-45
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2025-2-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Philosophy,EconomicsandLawReview_5_2_2025_-36-45.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2025-2-36?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:5:y:2025:i:2:p:36-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.