IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v5y2025i2p17-35.html

Poland’s experience in organising the monitoring of legal support for scientific and technological, and innovative activities

Author

Listed:
  • Kateryna Sokolova

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine how the control of legal support for scientific, technical, and innovation activities was implemented in Poland. Legislative acts of the Republic of Poland, Germany, and France were examined. The study employed the following methods: system analysis, comparative-legal method, formal legal method, content analysis, and synthesis. The instruments for stimulating innovation – tax reliefs for research and development activities (ulga B + R), the Innovation Box mechanism, and public-private partnership mechanisms in the innovation sphere – were also explored. The article analysed how Poland implemented the monitoring of legal norms’ effectiveness through digital tools (including Open System of Funds and Government Legislation Centre, ex-ante and ex-post evaluations, as well as through public consultations and legislative transparency. An institutional model was presented, providing coordination between state authorities, scientific institutions, and independent auditors, particularly the Supreme Audit Office. A comparative analysis of legal support approaches for scientific, technical, and innovation activities in Poland, Ukraine, France, and Germany was carried out. The study also examined countries’ rankings in the Global Innovation Index 2024, according to which Germany ranked 9th, France 12th, and Poland 40th. Based on the conducted analysis, a set of practical recommendations was formulated regarding the implementation of elements of the Polish experience in the Ukrainian legal framework, including the introduction of digital monitoring mechanisms, business tax incentives, and the creation of institutional infrastructure for innovation support. It was determined that implementing a comprehensive legal model similar to Poland’s could enhance the effectiveness of Ukraine’s state innovation policy and harmonise it with European standards. The practical significance of the study lies in developing a clear algorithm for introducing European experience in organising the monitoring of legal support for scientific, technical, and innovation activities in Ukraine to increase the effectiveness of national innovation policy

Suggested Citation

  • Kateryna Sokolova, 2025. "Poland’s experience in organising the monitoring of legal support for scientific and technological, and innovative activities," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 5(2), pages 17-35, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:5:y:2025:i:2:p:17-35
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2025-2-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Philosophy,EconomicsandLawReview_5_2_2025_-17-35.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2025-2-17?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:5:y:2025:i:2:p:17-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.