IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v4y2024i1p67-74.html

Message-based semantica for sat problems

Author

Listed:
  • Iaroslav Petik

Abstract

This paper outlines the logical system of MSSG-logic originally developed by the author to represent a particular theory in analytic philosophy of language. That was a theory by philosopher Paul Grice that proposed to consider the intention of the speaker as an important context for the definition of the true meaning of his speech act. MSSG-logic proposes to use special sets of symbols for the additional interpretation of the logical formulas as well as the supersets of these sets ("trees of messages") with defined algebras on them for more complex cases. This particular paper proposes to modify the "linguistic" MSSG-logic to represent the famous computer science boolean satisfiability problems (SAT) with the similar tools. The consequences for computer science and philosophy of language are also discussed

Suggested Citation

  • Iaroslav Petik, 2024. "Message-based semantica for sat problems," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 4(1), pages 67-74, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:4:y:2024:i:1:p:67-74
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2024-1-67-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/article_PETIK.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2024-1-67-74?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:4:y:2024:i:1:p:67-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.