Author
Listed:
- Viktor Koval
- Iryna Honcharova
- Nataliia Lysenko
Abstract
The article presents a model that will allow substantiating the sequence of introducing a system of innovative activities with integrated management of an integrated model of innovative activity. In order to identify the sequence of innovative activities, a study was made of indicators of maritime trade in Ukraine for the period from 2016 to 2020 according to the State Statistics Service of Ukraine. The features of the formation of an innovative marketing plan in the integrated model of innovative activity in maritime trade are considered. Using the presented mathematical model, an analysis of a potential plan for the introduction of innovations in various fields was carried out on the example of maritime trade in Ukraine, and their sequence was determined. The proposed mathematical model can be used to identify the influence of a certain set of factors on the result. The model can be applied to various types and categories of activities, showing the degree of influence of each of the selected influencing factors on the selected resulting attribute. The ability to select an arbitrary number of influence factors makes it universal for use in different types of activities and at different stages of analytical work. The article provides an example of the application of the developed mathematical model for the maritime trade of Ukraine. The obtained results indicate that the priority task in the field of innovation is the modernization of liquid transportation (significance coefficient for the final result -0.09), container transportation (significance coefficient -0.03), and packaged cargo (significance coefficient 0). Conducting a study in the field of maritime trade is due to the increase in the level of importance of this type of trade in modern conditions
Suggested Citation
Viktor Koval & Iryna Honcharova & Nataliia Lysenko, 2023.
"Management of an integrated model of innovation in maritime trade,"
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 3(2), pages 80-87, December.
Handle:
RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:80-87
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-2-80-87
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:80-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.