Author
Listed:
- Olena Galushko
- Cameron Batmanghlich
Abstract
Philosophical and ethical challenges to the use of artificial intelligence include many aspects, ranging from privacy and data security to issues of responsibility for the actions of AI. The rise of AI is changing the nature of knowledge and the educational process, creating new opportunities and challenges. The use of AI in the educational process raises not only questions of the technical organization of the educational process and evaluation of the results obtained with the help of AI, but also more global questions about the role of the teacher and student, about the social and ethical consequences of the transition to a new educational paradigm. Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing the education industry in various ways including virtual tutors, personalized learning, automated grading, smart content, intelligent tutoring systems, predictive analytics, student support systems, etc. However, the ethical considerations of implementing AI in higher education must be carefully examined to ensure that AI is used responsibly and ethically in the education sector. The article discusses the emergence and development of AI, its understanding from a technical and philosophical point of view. The ethical issues of using AI and its role in the human community are discussed. The ethical and practical aspects of using AI in the educational process are analyzed, and actual problems of AI implementation into the studying process in universities are proposed
Suggested Citation
Olena Galushko & Cameron Batmanghlich, 2023.
"Ethical and practical aspects of using the artificial intelligence in the educational process,"
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 3(2), pages 47-52, December.
Handle:
RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:47-52
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-2-40-46
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:47-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.