IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v3y2023i2p195-203.html

Problem aspects of institutionalization and implementation of the right to be forgotten

Author

Listed:
  • Ruslan Valieiev
  • Ricardo Daniel Furfaro

Abstract

The right to be forgotten has been institutionalized in the legal space of Europe and continues to cause debate both due to the high level of competition of this right with other rights and legitimate interests of various individuals, and due to the “transatlantic split” regarding the place of this right in the EU legal system and the US legal system. The article examines important aspects of the institutionalization and realization of the right to be forgotten, in particular: the search for the origins of its “conflict”; substantiation of search engine operators (and not site owners) as data controllers to whom applicants should contact; determination of the appeal procedure and actions of the controller; settlement of territorial jurisdiction of such disputes; determination of grounds for correction, erasure or blocking of information, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruslan Valieiev & Ricardo Daniel Furfaro, 2023. "Problem aspects of institutionalization and implementation of the right to be forgotten," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 3(2), pages 195-203, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:195-203
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-2-195-203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/article_VALIEIEV+.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-2-195-203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:195-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.