IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v3y2023i2p184-194.html

Theoretical and legal principles of the convergence of equality and justice in the field of personalized medicine in the context of the state’s social policy

Author

Listed:
  • Olha Rossylna

Abstract

In the context of health care, social justice plays a crucial role in ensuring that individuals have equal access to quality and affordable health services. This article delves into the significance of social justice in healthcare and its impact on the overall well-being of individuals. It emphasizes the need for a regulatory framework that fosters the integration of innovative technologies to enhance the quality and duration of human life. Additionally, the article sheds light on the role of the state in upholding and providing human rights and freedoms, particularly in the realm of personalized medicine. It concludes that achieving a modern level of convergence of the principles of equality and social justice in health care requires a comprehensive approach that takes into account legal, moral-ethical, financial-economic, and medical-innovative aspects. By addressing these various facets, it is possible to create a healthcare system that is not only efficient and effective but also equitable and just for all individuals

Suggested Citation

  • Olha Rossylna, 2023. "Theoretical and legal principles of the convergence of equality and justice in the field of personalized medicine in the context of the state’s social policy," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 3(2), pages 184-194, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:184-194
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-2-184-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/article_ROSSYLNA+.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-2-184-194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:184-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.