IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v3y2023i2p160-184.html

Regime of foreign occupation and its impact on human rights: From Polish and Ukrainian political-legal retrospective and nowadays

Author

Listed:
  • Andriy Samotuha
  • Rafał Lizut
  • Oleksii Kryzhanovskyi

Abstract

The research article deals with different regulatory and doctrinal (mostly based on Polish and Ukrainian sources) concepts of foreign occupation and current means of its enforcement, providing a description of the legal, political and social consequences caused by it, which are primarily suffered by the civilian population as a non-combatant, with the possibility of a full or partial retrospective analogy. The authors have concluded when the foreign occupation, from one hand, is committed aggressively to seize the alien territory and enslave its population the list of criminal manifestations of occupation state is quite wide and, unfortunately, endless. On the other hand, the possibility of establishing a real legal regime of foreign occupation is seen when the occupation is carried out as a countermeasure to the occupation with the aim of overcoming its negative consequences, restoring law and order and life in the de-occupied territory with the collective participation of international organizations, that will be the subject of further publications

Suggested Citation

  • Andriy Samotuha & Rafał Lizut & Oleksii Kryzhanovskyi, 2023. "Regime of foreign occupation and its impact on human rights: From Polish and Ukrainian political-legal retrospective and nowadays," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 3(2), pages 160-184, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:160-184
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-2-160-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/article_SAMOTUHA.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-2-160-184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:160-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.