Author
Abstract
The article deals with the “processes of globalization and secularization: aspects of hybrid influence on modern society”, which is relevant for science. This is a social phenomenon that has historical origins and has deepened over the years. The methods used and adopted as a basis are socio-philosophical and philosophy of history: Thomas H. Eriksen aspects of the globalization of society; Kevin H. O’Rourke, Jeffrey D. Williamson’s Globalization of History. The processes of globalization and secularization under the conditions of multiculturalism, war and hybrid attacks are analyzed, which otherwise arouses interest in world science and takes on a new meaning. Investigating the issue of the phenomenon of the formation and development of polyconfessionalism, we try to discover modern aspects of society. The processes of globalization and secularization have already been discussed with the philosophical community, but in today’s conditions, new methods and approaches to examining the world are emerging. The concept of “globalization”, “hybridity”, “secularization” was considered, which made it possible to reach a conclusion. Today, the processes of globalization and secularization as aspects of hybrid influence on modern society are an important topic for various fields of scientific activity. The russian invasion of a sovereign state gave the world the opportunity to feel the impact of hybrid attacks from the media, which became another real “front”. The hybridization of some aspects of society as a form of influence in the russian war is a challenge to unification with the “Slavic world”. Globalization, and sometimes, secularization processes oppose the localization of culture and anti-globalization. Global phenomena are observed in secularized countries rather than anti-globalization processes. Consideration of these social processes deserves the attention of world scientists
Suggested Citation
Olga Gold, 2023.
"Processes of globalization and secularization: Aspects of hybrid influence on modern society,"
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 3(1), pages 48-54, May.
Handle:
RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:48-54
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-1-48-54
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:48-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.