Author
Abstract
The Netherlands differ in many respects (historically, geographically, economically) from Ukraine. Consequently, the experiences of the Dutch police are different too. Nevertheless, those experiences may be useful to Ukrainian colleagues. After the end of the National Socialist occupation (1940-1945), the Dutch population and police wanted to forget that time as quickly as possible, to reconstruct their economy, but that turned out to be unwise: for decades a taboo on that past hindered a good relationship between the police and the citizens. That relationship was finally not restored by politicians, but by a new generation of police chiefs who learned from police abroad, in particular the Anglo-Saxon police. An important tool for improving the relationship turned out to be training police personnel in social skills: citizens require more from the police than enforcing laws. The ability to mediate in conflicts and to help finding psychosocial support strengthens policing enormously. A particular issue turned out to be dealing with misbehaving police officers. Frontline police-managers were given a special responsibility in counteracting misbehavior, but misbehaving police officers must also be able to count on correct treatment. Organized crime poses a particular threat to society and good policing in particular. In the fight against organized crime, the police learned that the administration is an indispensable ally, but that it is important too to preserve focus and that the population must be made resilient against the lure of this kind of crime. In modern policing, a special responsibility rests on the shoulders of police chiefs: they must seek a balance between the vertical relationship with the competent authorities and the horizontal relationship with the citizens
Suggested Citation
Guus Meershoek, 2023.
"Creating modern, community-oriented police: Some Dutch experiences,"
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 3(1), pages 210-217, May.
Handle:
RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:210-217
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-1-210-217
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:210-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.