IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v2y2022i2p25-36.html

The phenomenon of falun gong in the context of development of anti-totalitarian tendencies in religious culture of ukrainians

Author

Listed:
  • Iryna Grabovska
  • Tatiana Talko
  • Svitlana Kahamlyk

Abstract

The study of Falun Dafa phenomenon in the context of the essential opposition of the religious culture of Ukrainians to the aggressive religious rhetoric of racist totalitarianism in the conditions of russia’s war against Ukraine and the related transformations of the Ukrainian community is relevant. During the analysis, it was found that acquaintance with Chinese culture through the study of the non-traditional religious movement Falun Gong encourages Ukrainian scientists and young students to recognize the existence of strong totalitarian tendencies in the activities of the Chinese authorities and the Chinese Communist Party. Aggressive policy of the totalitarian government is reprehensible and encourages condemnation of practices of persecution for religious beliefs. The necessity of opposition from the side of neo-religious organizations to manifestations of state totalitarianism is concluded. In the conditions of military resistance to racism, this is a confirmation of the need to confront the totalitarian aggressor

Suggested Citation

  • Iryna Grabovska & Tatiana Talko & Svitlana Kahamlyk, 2022. "The phenomenon of falun gong in the context of development of anti-totalitarian tendencies in religious culture of ukrainians," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 2(2), pages 25-36, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2022:i:2:p:25-36
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2022-2-25-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/article_GRABOVSKA.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2022-2-25-36?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2022:i:2:p:25-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.