Author
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of normative – legal support of enforcement of court decisions through the prism of law enforcement practice. Emphasis is placed on the elements of a developing democratic society, which is open to change, implementation and enforcement of court decisions used by citizens, where an important role is given to the legislation on the implementation of the rules of enforcement proceedings. The changes taking place in Ukrainian society arouse high activity and the desire of people to take a direct part in solving problems that concern their common interests, including the use of the right to peaceful assembly. However, despite the importance of this type of political rights, the constitutional provisions on the protection of citizens' rights to a fair trial and enforcement of a court decision, which are still not properly specified in current legislation, are often limited or even violated. The need to amend procedural legislation taking into account the latest advances in science; the presence of different positions of scientists on the understanding of the essence and content of legal relations at the stage of implementation of the decision; negative practice of execution of judicial acts in Ukraine, which leads to the appeal of Ukrainian citizens to the European Court of Human Rights. The main innovation of the adopted laws and the basis of the concept of reform, which is laid down, is the introduction of the institution of private executors, which operates alongside the state executive service and performs the functions of enforcement of courts and other bodies
Suggested Citation
Vita Moroz, 2022.
"Legislative support enforcement of court judgments in Ukraine,"
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 2(1), pages 212-220, May.
Handle:
RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:212-220
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2022-1-212-220
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:212-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.