Author
Listed:
- Monika Hullová
- Andrea Pastuchová Neumannová
Abstract
In the paper, the authors analyse the situation in the Slovak Republic concerning child interrogation or examination independence on the fact, whether a child is a criminal offender or a victim. They focus on legal regulation of this issue in the legal system of the Slovak Republic, and on specifics of this procedure from the tactical and psychological point of view. The interrogation (or the examination) of the child is a very specific criminalistics method that is used in criminal proceedings. The particularities of this procedure are determined by the age, mental and emotional degree of child’s development, social status, suggestibility (ability to influence). These circumstances should be respected under every conduction of the interrogation (examination) of the child by the prosecutor, the investigator of the Police Force, or the authorized officer of the Police Force. The main aspects of this procedure are: To use psychologists or other experts before and during conduction of the procedure; Not to repeat the procedure in further criminal proceedings; To use special devices for recording or transmission of the sounds and voices; The instruction before interrogation (examination) should be adapted to the child (understandable, respectful, etc.); The procedure should be conducted in a good atmosphere and good conditions (psychological approaches; special interrogation rooms), etc
Suggested Citation
Monika Hullová & Andrea Pastuchová Neumannová, 2022.
"The specifics of police interrogation (examination) of children in the Slovak Republic,"
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 2(1), pages 189-198, May.
Handle:
RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:189-198
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2022-1-189-198
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:189-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.