IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v2y2022i1p16-26.html

Object-subject-superject: The beauty of mind

Author

Listed:
  • Lehel Simon

Abstract

To be interior in interactions or to be exterior in intraactions: how can we sense nature if we can’t even sense ourselves as objects? In this case we can be considered as autistic people and we must be living in a closed universe without “Nature”. We can express beauty of ourselves only if we can reflect to our mind, in itself. After this acting in process the World will be open for us. Is it possible? This mutual paradox is objectively measurable with a new test experiment. It represents the superject above the subject and object: the thing “Who” is able sense beauty as it surrounds us. The spontaneity is at the same time constant and changing: if we are able to act out the Whiteheadian universality of the process whilst seeing ourselves from above then there is no contradiction between the happening and the experiencing of the process. The Whiteheadian Philosophy could be a model of Ferenczian practice in interactive mutual Psychoanalysis, but the heterodox Psychoanalysis could provide practical Psychological background for Whiteheadian Theory. Beauty is an acting in process of our mind opening from itself to ourselves, therefore the intraactive elements become interactive things. Ourselves reflected to our World is the “Eternal Other”: The Psychological source of Aesthetics is the Psychology of Whiteheadian “superject”.

Suggested Citation

  • Lehel Simon, 2022. "Object-subject-superject: The beauty of mind," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 2(1), pages 16-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:16-26
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2022-1-16-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/article_SIMON+.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2022-1-16-26?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:16-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.