Author
Listed:
- Anastasiia Didenko
- Yevheniia Kovalenko-Marchenkova
- Olena Kravets
- Rafal Lizut
Abstract
Assessing the position of economic and human capital development level, building a strategy to improve the quality of life is extremely important for the state, so the study of indicators that form the quality of life and have the greatest impact on it remains relevant. Since the very concept of quality of life is a multicomponent category, characterized by both objective and subjective indicators, we consider it appropriate to structure knowledge about the factor environment that shapes the quality of life, their reflection by forming a cognitive model, its static analysis to identify the factors that have the greatest impact on quality of life to improve its level, which reflects the purpose of the study. A cognitive model of quality of life in the form of a balanced digraph was built based on 22 indicators of socio-economic conditions of Ukrainian households, grouped into four groups: population, education and health, socio-economic indicators. Structural analysis of the cognitive model made it possible to assess the classes of factors, establish the system characteristics of the model, identify the factors that have the greatest impact on the system, and assess their importance in modeling the self-development of the situation. Considering the weights of factors and external influences, it is determined that the assessment of the quality of life is most influenced by a group of health factors, while the growth of the quality of life indicator contributes most to the growth of the population and reduces its migration
Suggested Citation
Anastasiia Didenko & Yevheniia Kovalenko-Marchenkova & Olena Kravets & Rafal Lizut, 2021.
"Cognitive approach to modeling populationʼs quality of life,"
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 1(2), pages 92-100, August.
Handle:
RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:92-100
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2021-2-92-100
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:92-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.