IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v1y2021i2p7-17.html

Anti-correlationism cluster and performative narrative

Author

Listed:
  • Pavlo Kretov
  • Olena Kretova

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to elucidate the defining tendencies of anticorrelationism and its narrative strategies as a fundamental basis of speculative realism, and to consider one of its versions, namely, object-oriented ontology in relation to the concept of narrative ontology and the notion of performative as an anthropological marker of discourse from the perspective of understanding the problem of philosophical anthropology. The authors proceed from the paradoxical nature of anti-correlationism guidelines that substantiate nonrelational metaphysics, while postulating the construction of a narrative ontology of reality, which has the characteristics of a performative. For the first time, the anthropological content of defining tendencies of anti-correlationism and its narrative strategies as a fundamental basis of speculative realism and object-oriented ontology are compared with the concept of narrative ontology and the notion of performative as an anthropological marker of discourse. It has been found that the discursive critique of correlationism is internally contradictory, as it appeals to the thinking and consciousness of the subject and the narrative it creates as a picture of the world. Nowadays, the performative functions as a model of language and speech meaning formation that ontologize the reality of human consciousness, experience and thinking

Suggested Citation

  • Pavlo Kretov & Olena Kretova, 2021. "Anti-correlationism cluster and performative narrative," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 1(2), pages 7-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:7-17
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2021-2-7-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Philosophy,EconomicsandLawReview_Vol_1.No.2(2021).-1-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2021-2-7-17?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:7-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.