Author
Listed:
- Yurii Parshyn
- Marharyta Parshyna
- Volodymyr Yefimov
Abstract
Attention is paid to the fact that in order to make reasonable decisions, it is necessary to rely on the experience, knowledge and specialistsʼ intuition. A large number of methods for obtaining expert assessments, has been noted. The methods of examination are also differ, in some of them work is being done separately with the expert, in others the problem is being discussed collectively, opinion of other experts is being studied, incorrect ways of decision are being rejected. It is also emphasized that there is diversity at all stages of the examination: formation of the group by number, qualifications of experts. Using of statistical data processing also differs significantly, from mathematical to computerized. The main methods and stages of expert evaluation have been given. Emphasis is being placed on assessments, their classification according to various criteria and characteristics. Conditions for measuring of qualitative and quantitative characteristics and the main requirements for them are being indicated. Attention is being paid to the conditions of using of the interval scale and the order scale. The methodology of expertsʼ work in case of definition of probabilistic expert estimations is being described. Peculiarities of using the methods which are most often used in practice have being described, among which are method of academician V. Glushkova, morphological method, QUEST, PATTERN, SEER methods and Delphi method. A combined method of examination at enterprises with specific working conditions is being proposed. The algorithm of examination has been developed and the main stages of examination, and functions of the persons which are taking part in examination have been olefined. The main requirements to the automated expert system have been highlighted
Suggested Citation
Yurii Parshyn & Marharyta Parshyna & Volodymyr Yefimov, 2021.
"Approaches to the development of the complex method of expertise at enterprises,"
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 1(2), pages 68-77, September.
Handle:
RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:68-77
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2021-2-68-77
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:68-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.