IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v1y2021i2p25-37.html

Critical and logical thinking formation as the educational competence in the modern training system for lawyers

Author

Listed:
  • Olha Holovina
  • Dimitrina Kamenova

Abstract

At the current stage of development, the education faces a social demand for the shaping of a highly qualified competitive specialist wanted in the global world and the global labor market. Nowoday, in the world community, competencies related to the perception and information processing such as logical and critical thinking (cognitive competencies) are the most popular ones. Such competencies shaping is one of the educational tasks, in particular legal education. The research deals with theoretical, methodical, scientific and practical principles of logical and critical thinking shaping as main educational competencies required for a modern specialist. As a result of the research the theoretical bases and means cognitive competences shaping have been covered, the ways of logical and critical thinking shaping of future lawyers have been suggested. The author has recommended the introduction of special training courses for future lawyers into the educational process considering the specifics of the competencies given above

Suggested Citation

  • Olha Holovina & Dimitrina Kamenova, 2021. "Critical and logical thinking formation as the educational competence in the modern training system for lawyers," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 1(2), pages 25-37, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:25-37
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2022-1-26-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Philosophy,EconomicsandLawReview_Vol_1.No.2(2021).-19-31.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2022-1-26-41?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:25-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.