Author
Listed:
- Oksana Мyslyva
- Olena Nykyforova
- Iuliia Kuntsevych
Abstract
The article discusses the possibilities and practical importance of using interactive forms of training, and the main attention is paid to the study of the positive impact of situational roleplaying games on the provision of pre-medic training in the context of their practical implementation during police training in appropriate institutions with specific training conditions. The authors believe that is very important to grant future police officers (cadets) with conditions for gaining stable skills of automatic manipulation when giving premedical care and ensure their understanding of the processes that will occur in the victimʼs body. However, this knowledge and skills must be based on awareness of the risk of being in extreme conditions. To assess the efficiency of different pedagogical approaches to teaching premedical training to future police officers, the authors identify 3 models of practical training: using situational tasks without approaching the real conditions of professional activity, situational tasks with the elements of role-playing games and cases under stressful conditions, only studentsʼ demonstration of their practical skills with the elements of practice. The success of the cadets in the exam was evaluated. The authors consider it appropriate that in premedical training of cadets for the development of basic practical skills, which are required for future professional activity, as well as for the creation of prerequisites for psychological readiness to implement in practice these skills and abilities, teachers should purposefully use active and interactive forms and technologies
Suggested Citation
Oksana Мyslyva & Olena Nykyforova & Iuliia Kuntsevych, 2021.
"The modern methods of first aid (premedical care) teaching in the police institutions,"
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 1(2), pages 219-231, September.
Handle:
RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:219-231
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2021-2-219-231
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:219-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.