Author
Listed:
- Oleksandr Ostrohliad
- Liubomyr Ilyn
- Lidiya Tsymbalista
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to reveal the historical reasons for the emergence and distribution of death penalty as well as the attitude of Ukrainians to this type of punishment. Particular attention is paid to the attitude of contemporary traditional ideological currents to the death penalty in Ukraine. The research methodology is based on the principles of historicism, continuity and objectivity. The interdisciplinary nature of the study led to the use of a range of general scientific, philosophical and special historical methods, among which we distinguish the following: historical method, comparative method, document analysis, and others. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the social challenges Ukraine is currently facing, based on which we discuss the need to restore the death penalty. The historical retrospective and evolution of the assertion of the death penalty from ancient times to the present day has shown that the death penalty is not traditional. As a rule, its establishment on the territory of Ukraine is associated with the presence of the territory of our country within other states in a particular historical period, as well as subjective and objective conditions for the development of national liberation movements in the early and mid-twentieth century. Although not an inherent punishment for Ukrainians, the death penalty has a significant impact on the public awareness, as well as the processes of state formation. The formal and declarative nature of this type of punishment in the Old Rus state was replaced by active application in the Polish-Lithuanian era. This in turn influenced the adoption of the death penalty for war crimes among the Cossacks. The most ambiguous period in Ukrainian history and the use of the death penalty is the twentieth century, when the amnesty and renunciation of executions proclaimed by the Third Universal of the Central Rada changed to the use of the death penalty for war crimes during the Hetmanate, Directory and Western Ukraine. For Soviet totalitarianism, the death penalty was not so much a method of punishment as an instrument of asserting power. Under conditions of independence, Ukraine has evolved from a country with one of the highest rates of the death penalty to its abolition. In our opinion, the debates in society and politics evidence the poor legal culture and historical memory, which actually need to be corrected, e.g. through scientific research. If we try to define the role of the death penalty in historical retrospect, it was not just the factor of realization of a specific legal or ideological worldview, but also a measure of the spread of democratic and humanistic ideals and values. Attitude to the death penalty is a measure of “maturity of society”. As an object of repressive policy of the Soviet government, Ukrainians should become the main opponents of the death penalty as a punishment for crime in the 21st century, as Ukraine has always sought European standards of humanity and treatment of convicts
Suggested Citation
Oleksandr Ostrohliad & Liubomyr Ilyn & Lidiya Tsymbalista, 2021.
"History of the death penalty in Ukraine: Causes, stages and influence on public awareness,"
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 1(2), pages 198-207, August.
Handle:
RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:198-207
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/10.31733/2786-491X-2021-2-198-207
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:198-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.