IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v1y2021i2p116-122.html

Polygraph in criminal proceedings: Prospects of use

Author

Listed:
  • Anatoliy Volobuyev
  • Tetyana Orlova

Abstract

The problematic issues of using a polygraph in criminal proceedings, which are relevant for many countries, are considered. Based on the analysis of judicial practice and publications of recent years, including foreign ones, the solution of the following issues is proposed: what should be the form of application of polygraph in criminal proceedings (definition of investigative action); what is the basis for the use of a polygraph in criminal proceedings; who can be the direct authorized subject of the polygraph application; what should be the method of using a polygraph in criminal proceedings. Attention is drawn to the importance of resolving these issues for investigative and judicial practice in accordance with the laws of a country. It is noted that the use of a polygraph requires the use of special knowledge in the field of psychology. Therefore, the use of a polygraph in criminal proceedings is possible only during the psychological examination of a person in order to obtain indicative information to solve the tasks set by the initiator of the examination. It is substantiated that the basis for the use of a polygraph is the nature of the tasks of the initiator of the examination in the absence of medical contraindications in the subject, as well as his written consent to the survey using a polygraph. Only a psychologist with a polygraph operator as a technical assistant can be the subject of the polygraph application and evaluation of the test results. The method of con-ducting a human study using a polygraph expert determines independently, based on the tasks formulated by the initiator of the examination. It is noted that a separate study requires the preparation of a criminal psychological examination using a polygraph, defining its tasks, methods of conducting and evaluating its results. The solution of these problems in different countries will depend on the specifics of national legislation

Suggested Citation

  • Anatoliy Volobuyev & Tetyana Orlova, 2021. "Polygraph in criminal proceedings: Prospects of use," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 1(2), pages 116-122, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:116-122
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2021-2-9-116-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Philosophy,EconomicsandLawReview_Vol_1.No.2(2021).-112-118.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2021-2-9-116-122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:116-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.