IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v1y2021i2p101-108.html

Penitentiary crime as a social phenomenon inherent in places of non-freedom in Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Іvan Bogatyrev

Abstract

Penitentiary crime as a social phenomenon inherent in places of non-freedom in Ukraine is described in the article. The opinions of foreign and domestic scientists on the concept of penitentiary crime are analyzed. Penitentiary crime in places of incarceration is identified according to the typology of the object of a criminal offense. The authorʼs definition of penitentiary crime is formulated. We have identified crime in places of non-freedom according to the typology of the object of a criminal offense committed in places of non-freedom, dividing it into the following groups: 1) penitentiary criminal offenses; 2) violent criminal offenses; 3) narcotic criminal offenses; 4) criminal offenses against property; 5) official and corruption offenses. All of them together characterize penitentiary crime

Suggested Citation

  • Іvan Bogatyrev, 2021. "Penitentiary crime as a social phenomenon inherent in places of non-freedom in Ukraine," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 1(2), pages 101-108, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:101-108
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2021-2-101-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Philosophy,EconomicsandLawReview_Vol_1.No.2(2021).-95-102.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2021-2-101-108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:101-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.