IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v1y2021i1p63-72.html

Development of P2P lending in term of crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron Batmanghlich
  • Volodymyr Bobyl
  • Larysa Martseniuk

Abstract

The article is devoted to definition content, disadvantages, advantages and features of P2P (person to person) lending under ordinary circumstances and in times of crisis. The main problem of P2P lending in the period of significant changes in environmental factors is a high risk of non-repayment of credit. Recommendations to reduce the risk of investors through the use of technology in neural models of individual credit risk assessment (scoring) an individual borrower. In actual credit history defined performance using qualitative and quantitative indicators to determine the level of solvency of borrowers individual. Interrelation researched the credit risk of the borrower-class individual, the interest rate (price) and maximum size P2P loan. Recommended consider the impact of environmental factors in the decision to grant consumer loans to individuals P2P

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron Batmanghlich & Volodymyr Bobyl & Larysa Martseniuk, 2021. "Development of P2P lending in term of crisis," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 1(1), pages 63-72, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:63-72
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2021-76-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Philosophy,EconomicsandLawReview_Vol_1.No.1(2021)-62-71.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2021-76-85?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:63-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.