IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxo/ijsshr/v4y2026i2id271.html

Participatory Governance and Mitigation of Economic Inequalities in West Pokot County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Yerer Peter Lokor

    (Scholar, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology)

  • Dr. Dorcas Jepkemboi Kebenei (PhD)

    (Lecturer: Kabarak University)

  • Dr. Josphat Watiba Kwasira (PhD)

    (Senior Lecturer: Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology)

Abstract

West Pokot County exhibits significant economic disparities, including limited access to education, healthcare, clean water, electricity, and road infrastructure. The county’s poverty levels, currently estimated at 57%, remain above the national average. These inequalities have historical roots in marginalization, pastoralist livelihoods, and limited investment, resulting in persistent social and economic exclusion of certain communities. While participatory governance mechanisms exist in the county, their effectiveness in promoting equity is unclear. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to examine the role of participatory governance in mitigating economic inequalities in West Pokot County, Kenya. It specifically sought to analyze the influence of participatory planning, participatory budgeting, citizen monitoring, and institutional capacity on mitigating economic inequalities in West Pokot County, Kenya. Theoretical frameworks underpinning this research include the; Participatory Governance Theory, Social Justice Theory, Empowerment Theory, and Institutional Theory. This study adopted a mixed-methods research design, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. The target population comprised of residents of West Pokot County, ward administrators, county officials, civil society actors, and community leaders engaged in participatory governance initiatives, a total population of 520 individuals. From these, a sample size of 120 respondents was selected using stratified random sampling across the four County’s four sub-counties. Data was collected through questionnaires, interview schedules, and focus group discussions guides. Both descriptive and inferential statistical methods was used to analyse the data which was presented in tables and discussed. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic content analysis and the results used to provide supporting narratives for the quantitative results. The study found that participatory planning and citizen monitoring significantly mitigate economic inequalities in West Pokot County by fostering community involvement, transparency, accountability, and responsive governance, while participatory budgeting had a limited, inconsistent effect. Institutional capacity was also found to significantly influence inequality reduction, with competent personnel, clear procedures, and adequate resources enhancing participatory governance. Qualitative findings revealed variability in stakeholder engagement, representation of marginalized groups, and resource utilization, highlighting areas for improvement. The study recommends that county authorities institutionalize participatory mechanisms, standardize budgeting protocols, strengthen citizen oversight structures, and invest in staff capacity development. These measures would enhance transparency, equitable inclusion, accountability, and the county’s ability to implement development programs, thereby reducing economic inequalities and improving governance effectiveness across all sub-counties.

Suggested Citation

  • Yerer Peter Lokor & Dr. Dorcas Jepkemboi Kebenei (PhD) & Dr. Josphat Watiba Kwasira (PhD), 2026. "Participatory Governance and Mitigation of Economic Inequalities in West Pokot County, Kenya," International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (IJSSHR) ISSN 2959-7056 (o); 2959-7048 (p), Research bridge Publisher, vol. 4(2), pages 47-65, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxo:ijsshr:v:4:y:2026:i:2:id:271
    DOI: 10.61108/ijsshr.v4i2.271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchbridgepublisher.com/index.php/ijsshr/article/view/271
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://researchbridgepublisher.com/index.php/ijsshr/article/download/271/306
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.61108/ijsshr.v4i2.271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxo:ijsshr:v:4:y:2026:i:2:id:271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Contact (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://researchbridgepublisher.com/index.php/ijsshr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.