IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxi/jcsit0/v2y2025i2id469.html

Exploring Public Trust in AI Healthcare Systems: A Questionnaire-based Study on Bias, Reliability, and Privacy Concerns

Author

Listed:
  • Emran Hossain

    (Chief Instructor & Department Head, Department of Computer Science & Technology, Confidence Polytechnic Institute, Bangladesh)

  • Naeem Aziz

    (Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh)

  • Jakaria Alam

    (MSc, Department of Data Science, LaTrobe University, Australia)

  • Mysha Islam Kakon

    (BSc, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh)

  • Fazlul Haque

    (BSc, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh)

Abstract

The healthcare industry is now more and more adopting artificial intelligence (AI) in support of improving diagnosis, managing virtual consults, and carrying out predictive analysis. Even with the increasing use of these systems, their value is subject to public trust. This research examines social opinions on artificial intelligence in healthcare, targeting dimensions of reliability, bias, and concerns for privacy. A questionnaire survey was conducted, which collected 1,019 questionnaires from the public, representing all age groups, both genders, all educational levels, and all professions. Results indicate that 88.6% of the respondent participants made use of healthcare services that had AI interwoven in them, for instance, chatbots, cell phone applications, or internet-aided diagnosis tools. Participants had varying opinions regarding the reliability of the AI systems. Specifically, 39.9% believed them to be equally reliable as human professionals, 48.3% less reliable, and 11.8% more reliable. There was high skepticism regarding fairness in this context. While 46.5% of the interviewers believed that AI is equally fair to all human beings, 68% assumed that available data is incomplete or biased in favor of Western populations. Data and privacy protection were among the major concerns, with 68.4% worried that their health-related information would not be safeguarded appropriately. While it was also thought to be important that artificial intelligence systems should clearly demonstrate their limitation, 89% of the interviewees indicated that transparency in the matter was critical. Finally, the results show that consumers are steadily accepting artificial intelligence in the healthcare industry in a cautious way. Although users find the convenience beneficial, they lack trust in the accuracy, fairness, and protection of their confidential information. The study suggests that in building public trust, it is critical to use inclusive datasets that contain heterogeneous groups, use effective privacy controls, and have transparency. To achieve more refined insight regarding whether trust in AI health systems has increased or decreased with time, future studies should look at inter-cultural perceptions and longitudinal analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Emran Hossain & Naeem Aziz & Jakaria Alam & Mysha Islam Kakon & Fazlul Haque, 2025. "Exploring Public Trust in AI Healthcare Systems: A Questionnaire-based Study on Bias, Reliability, and Privacy Concerns," Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, Bluemark Publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 12-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxi:jcsit0:v:2:y:2025:i:2:id:469
    DOI: 10.61424/jcsit.v2i2.469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bluemarkpublishers.com/index.php/JCSIT/article/view/469
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bluemarkpublishers.com/index.php/JCSIT/article/download/469/410
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.61424/jcsit.v2i2.469?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxi:jcsit0:v:2:y:2025:i:2:id:469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://bluemarkpublishers.com/index.php/JCSIT .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.