IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxb/issued/v19i2n01.html

CSR of multinational companies and HRM in Africa: an attempt to specify Carroll's pyramid

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob KOTCHO

    (Catholic University of Central Africa and INALCO-Paris Sorbonne Cité, France)

Abstract

Carroll’s pyramid is recognized as an appropriate model for the analysis of corporate social responsibility. But it has limitations, among which the failure to take into account the specificities of all categories of stakeholders in the business, including human resources, as well as the specific realities of the environment in which it operates. The question before us is therefore that of knowing, how to analyze CSR of both multinational and national companies related human resources taking into account the specific context of its environment? Based on the analysis of the components of the four levels of accountability proposed by Carroll, we identified additional indicators that allow a comprehensive analysis of CSR from the perspective of HRM, including: (i) the quality of earnings staff, suppliers and contractors of the company, as well as the quality and level of prices of goods and services provided by the company to the consumer; (ii) the commitment of the company operating in a country that has not translated internationally recognized CSR principles in its domestic law, to implement them; (iii) the willingness of the company to conduct ethical and philanthropic activities towards staff and other corporate human resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob KOTCHO, 2024. "CSR of multinational companies and HRM in Africa: an attempt to specify Carroll's pyramid," Les Cahiers du CEDIMES, Institut CEDIMES, vol. 19(2), pages 9-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxb:issued:v19:i2:n01
    DOI: 10.69611/cahiers19-2-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.69611/cahiers19-2-01
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.69611/cahiers19-2-01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxb:issued:v19:i2:n01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Radu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cedp2fr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.