IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cwf/podart/pod2026260.html

Diagnostic accuracy of smartphone and artificial intelligence tools for diabetic foot screening

Author

Listed:
  • Cabrera, Oscar Alfredo
  • oscaracabrera@yahoo.com.ar
  • Feldick, Francis
  • fafeldick@gmail.com
  • Cabrera, Sheila Ailin
  • sheilacabrera2304@icloud.com
  • Delbon, Erica Cecilia
  • chechudel@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic foot ulcers precede most diabetes-related lower-limb amputations, and early detection depends on specialist clinical assessment that is not always available. Smartphone-based and artificial intelligence image tools could extend screening, but their diagnostic accuracy remains scattered across heterogeneous studies. Methods: A systematic review; the bibliographic databases consulted were Scopus, Pubmed, Google Scholar, Open Alex and Crossref. Results: From 963 records, 19 studies were included, 8 of smartphone-based tools and 11 of artificial intelligence models. A smartphone artificial intelligence system detected ulcers with 0.9% sensitivity and 0.9% specificity against expert judgement. Deep learning models reported accuracy between 78.3% and 99.9%, sensitivity between 95.2% and 99.9%, and specificity between 94.0% and 99.9%. Patient selection was at high risk of bias in 15 of 19 studies. Conclusions: Smartphone and artificial intelligence tools reach high diagnostic accuracy for diabetic foot screening, but the evidence derives mostly from retrospective image datasets and requires prospective external validation before clinical use.

Suggested Citation

  • Cabrera, Oscar Alfredo & oscaracabrera@yahoo.com.ar & Feldick, Francis & fafeldick@gmail.com & Cabrera, Sheila Ailin & sheilacabrera2304@icloud.com & Delbon, Erica Cecilia & chechudel@gmail.com, 2026. "Diagnostic accuracy of smartphone and artificial intelligence tools for diabetic foot screening," SAP Podiatry, South American Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:cwf:podart:pod2026260
    DOI: 10.62486/pod2026260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://southam.pub/journals/files/pod/pod2026260en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.62486/pod2026260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwf:podart:pod2026260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: South American Publishing Journals Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://southam.pub/journals/pod.php .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.