IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cwf/moarti/mo202317.html

Analysis of the difference of the legally relevant facts of the indicator facts

Author

Listed:
  • Botero Gómez, Lina Verónica
  • Nova Guevara, Diego Alejandro

Abstract

Current jurisprudential positions have exposed a series of errors incurred within the new accusatory criminal system led by the Attorney General's Office, specifically in the construction of the Legally Relevant Facts, since it does not conform to the expected and indicated assumptions. by law and other rules of criminal procedure. These failures are directly related to effects on due process, in such a way that it is the responsibility of all levels of society and especially the judicial branch to deal with mistakes. That is why, through a general analysis of all the aspects that frame the criminal technique of the Legally Relevant Facts found in the Political Constitution of Colombia, in the jurisprudence and other laws, it was possible to identify such failures, their consequences, but also formulated a series of recommendations that are expected to serve to reduce the risk of the duration of rights and become a point of reference for similar investigations

Suggested Citation

  • Botero Gómez, Lina Verónica & Nova Guevara, Diego Alejandro, 2024. "Analysis of the difference of the legally relevant facts of the indicator facts," SAP Multidisciplinary Open, South American Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:cwf:moarti:mo202317
    DOI: 10.62486/mo202317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://southam.pub/journals/files/mo/mo202317en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://southam.pub/journals/files/mo/mo202317es.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.62486/mo202317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwf:moarti:mo202317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: South American Publishing Journals Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://southam.pub/journals/mo.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.