IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cwf/aidart/aid2026135.html

Evaluation of the accuracy and robustness of large language models in dental examinations: sensitivity analysis of question format and evaluation parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Atassi, Andrea
  • Stewart, Shachar
  • Brackenridge, Carrie
  • Kamin, Eliza

Abstract

Introduction: Large language models are increasingly evaluated on medical examination questions, but their performance on dental questions, and the robustness of that performance to question format and decoding settings, is not established. Methods: A fixed set of 100 dental multiple-choice questions was drawn from the MedMCQA validation split and posed to a large language model in a zero-shot setting. Accuracy was scored against the reference answer, and sensitivity analyses varied question format, decoding temperature and sample size. Results: The model answered 70 of 100 dental examination questions correctly, for an accuracy of 0.700 (95% CI 0.604 to 0.781). The estimate remained essentially unchanged at a higher decoding temperature (0.690) and on a 50-question subsample (0.700), while it differed between single-choice (0.733) and multiple-choice (0.625) question formats. Conclusions: The model achieved a robust accuracy of 0.700 on dental examination questions, and the estimate was stable to temperature and sample size but sensitive to question format, with higher accuracy on single-choice than on multiple-choice questions.

Suggested Citation

  • Atassi, Andrea & Stewart, Shachar & Brackenridge, Carrie & Kamin, Eliza, 2026. "Evaluation of the accuracy and robustness of large language models in dental examinations: sensitivity analysis of question format and evaluation parameters," SAP Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry, South American Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:cwf:aidart:aid2026135
    DOI: 10.62486/aid2026135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://southam.pub/journals/files/aid/aid2026135en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.62486/aid2026135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwf:aidart:aid2026135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: South American Publishing Journals Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://southam.pub/journals/aid.php .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.