IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cwf/aidart/aid202514.html

Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning for detecting dental caries on bitewing and periapical radiographs: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Vallongo, Greta Cordovi
  • Capote Fernández, Marta María

Abstract

Introduction: Deep learning models have been proposed to automate caries detection on intraoral radiographs, but reported accuracy varies widely and the evidence has not been synthesized specifically for bitewing and periapical projections. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020, PubMed, OpenAlex, and Crossref were searched for studies published from 2018 to 2025 that evaluated deep learning models for detecting, classifying, or segmenting dental caries on bitewing or periapical radiographs against a reference standard. Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2. Results: Thirty-nine studies were included, most published in 2024 and 2025 and most using bitewing radiographs and YOLO architectures. Reported sensitivity ranged from 13.7% to 99.4%, specificity from 70.6% to 99.9%, and the area under the curve reached 0.954. The single histologically validated study reported sensitivity of 13.7% and specificity of 95.9%. Conclusions: Deep learning attains high but highly heterogeneous accuracy for caries detection on intraoral radiographs. Estimates often exceed the accuracy expected of expert readers but weaken when validated against histology, and prospective external validation is still lacking.

Suggested Citation

  • Vallongo, Greta Cordovi & Capote Fernández, Marta María, 2025. "Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning for detecting dental caries on bitewing and periapical radiographs: a systematic review," SAP Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry, South American Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:cwf:aidart:aid202514
    DOI: 10.62486/aid202514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://southam.pub/journals/files/aid/aid202514en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.62486/aid202514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwf:aidart:aid202514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: South American Publishing Journals Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://southam.pub/journals/aid.php .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.