IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cwd/ijbmnz/v5y2026i2p326-348.html

An integral financial indicator approach to ranking technology service companies: An empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mikayel Rafayel Gyulasaryan

    (Parvanyan Consulting LLC, Armenia)

  • Ashot Varazdat Matevosyan

    (Armenian State University of Economics)

  • Mane Henrik Matevosyan

    (Armenian State University of Economics)

Abstract

This paper develops a sector-adaptive integral financial indicator framework for evaluating and ranking technology service companies. While composite indices are widely used in financial performance analysis, existing approaches remain largely sector-neutral, overlook the directional heterogeneity of financial indicators, and rely on single aggregation structures, potentially leading to biased or incomplete assessments. To address these limitations, the paper proposes a multidimensional composite index that integrates profitability, leverage, and capital structure within a unified analytical framework. The methodology introduces three key innovations: (i) a sector-specific design tailored to the financial characteristics of technology service firms, (ii) a direction-sensitive normalization procedure that explicitly distinguishes between beneficial and non-beneficial indicators, and (iii) a dual aggregation structure combining additive and geometric methods to evaluate compensatory and non-compensatory effects. The proposed approach is applied to a longitudinal dataset of leading technology service companies over the period 2012-2024. The results reveal substantial heterogeneity in financial performance, with a clear differentiation between improving, stable, and at-risk firms. The analysis also demonstrates that aggregation structure and indicator directionality significantly influence ranking outcomes, underscoring the importance of methodological design in composite index construction. Robustness and sensitivity analyses confirm the stability and reliability of the proposed framework. The study contributes to the literature by advancing composite index methodology through a sector-adaptive and directionally consistent approach, while providing a transparent and replicable tool for firm ranking. From a practical perspective, the framework offers valuable implications for investors, analysts, and policymakers by enabling more accurate benchmarking and informed decision-making in technology-driven markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikayel Rafayel Gyulasaryan & Ashot Varazdat Matevosyan & Mane Henrik Matevosyan, 2026. "An integral financial indicator approach to ranking technology service companies: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Business and Management (IJBM), International Emerging Scholars Society (IESS), New Zealand, vol. 5(2), pages 326-348, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cwd:ijbmnz:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:326-348
    DOI: 10.56879/ijbm.v5i2.91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iessociety.org/index.php/IJBM/article/download/340/139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56879/ijbm.v5i2.91?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwd:ijbmnz:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:326-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cindy Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iessociety.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.