IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cwd/ijbmnz/v2y2023i1p66-75.html

A Comparative Analysis Career Drivers Marketing & Financial Professionals using RSI Psychometric Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Kavita Adsule

    (Buckinghamshire New University)

  • Preeti Surkutwar

    (University Canada West)

Abstract

The paper presents the authors’ own research, which points to the possibility of applying the Richmond Survey Instrument test on the two different profiles of employees (Finance & Marketing) in Pune region. Participants and procedure-The research was conducted in the years 2019-2020 in Pune. The study population comprised 100 individuals from both the profiles. The employees were selected by Non-Probability Convenience Sampling method. The research participants had never undergone psychological evaluation for personality test (for instance, they had never taken the RSI test). The study population comprised 133 males (66.5%) and 67 females (33.5%). Results The statistical procedures applied in the present study allowed us to conduct empirical examination of the indicators of the investigated variables constituting the major psychological criteria for describing psychological functioning of personality, and thus to identify the main Career Anchors of these two professionals. Analysis of the data obtained as a result of this research allowed us to distinguish two significantly different clusters in the group examined individuals. The results of the present investigation indicate that cluster 1 exhibited a higher level of Strong determination to the specific Career Anchors whereas of personality structure compared with the study participants belonging to cluster 2. Keywords: Richmond survey Indicator; Psychological; Career Anchors; Personality

Suggested Citation

  • Kavita Adsule & Preeti Surkutwar, 2023. "A Comparative Analysis Career Drivers Marketing & Financial Professionals using RSI Psychometric Tool," International Journal of Business and Management (IJBM), International Emerging Scholars Society (IESS), New Zealand, vol. 2(1), pages 66-75, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cwd:ijbmnz:v:2:y:2023:i:1:p:66-75
    DOI: 10.56879/ijbm.v2i1.18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iessociety.org/index.php/IJBM/article/download/18/20
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56879/ijbm.v2i1.18?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwd:ijbmnz:v:2:y:2023:i:1:p:66-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cindy Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iessociety.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.