IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvt/journl/y2025id1139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Performance Factors in Project Implementation: Comparing Agile, Hybrid Methodologies and Waterfall Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • R. K. Nigmatullin

  • A. G. Dmitriev

Abstract

This paper provides a comparative study of performance measurement ratios in various project management methodologies: Agile, hybrid approaches and Waterfall.The purpose of the study is to determine the role and significance of these coefficients in the context of project management, as well as to analyze their application in each of the methodologies under consideration.The focus is on agility, adaptability to change and continuous feedback in Agile, the balance between structure and adaptation in hybrid methodologies, and rigorous planning and its impact on measuring project success in Waterfall.The analysis showed that the choice of approach to project management depends on specific conditions and tasks. Each of the approaches considered has advantages and disadvantages. The choice of approach should be based on an analysis of the specific conditions of the project, its goals and limitations.The results of the study can be useful for project managers, managers and other professionals involved in project management. They can help them choose the most appropriate approach to project management and improve its efficiency by implementing factors to evaluate it.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:cvt:journl:y:2025:id:1139
DOI: 10.24182/2073-6258-2025-24-2-36-46
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.scinotes.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1139/906
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24182/2073-6258-2025-24-2-36-46?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvt:journl:y:2025:id:1139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.