IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvt/journl/y2025id1121.html

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of organizing your own delivery service and cooperation with special courier services in the restaurant business

Author

Listed:
  • K. V. Martynov

Abstract

This paper raises the problem of evaluating the effectiveness of various ways of organizing the delivery of ready meals from restaurants. In the process of research, a unified vision of this vast problem is formed. All data is formulated and structured by the method of comparative analysis. The results of the study are summarized in a single table that provides a visual representation of the disadvantages and advantages of various delivery methods. The relevance of the study is due to the increased demand for ready–o–eat delivery services and growing competition among restaurateurs. The conclusion is formulated that it is more expedient for a small business that is at the start to use the services of an aggregator, while a network business should develop its own delivery service and work to increase brand awareness. The results of this study allow us to give an idea to established and novice restaurateurs about what stages they need to go through on the way to realizing the delivery of their products and will allow them to make an informed decision.Â

Suggested Citation

  • K. V. Martynov, 2025. "Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of organizing your own delivery service and cooperation with special courier services in the restaurant business," Scientific notes of the Russian academy of entrepreneurship, JSC “Publishing Agency “Science and Educationâ€, vol. 24(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:cvt:journl:y:2025:id:1121
    DOI: 10.24182/2073-6258-2025-24-1-83-90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scinotes.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1121/902
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24182/2073-6258-2025-24-1-83-90?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvt:journl:y:2025:id:1121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.