IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvt/journl/y2025id1112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowdsourcing in the implementation of the method of expert assessment of the degree of effectiveness of the use of municipal treasury property

Author

Listed:
  • O. S. Kolesov

Abstract

The article substantiates the author’s opinion on the need to take into account the property of the municipal treasury as one of the objects of regional management and as an object for replenishing the regional budget. The duality of the participation of this facility in the regional management system determines the need to assess the degree of effectiveness of its use. For this purpose, the author suggests the use of crowdsourcing as a tool for attracting a wide range of professionals in the analyzed field when conducting an expert assessment of the degree of effectiveness of using municipal treasury property. The article substantiates the possible directions of using crowdsourcing when conducting an expert assessment of the degree of effectiveness of using municipal treasury property. The purpose of the work is to prove that it is necessary to assess the degree of efficiency of using municipal treasury property, and the assessment process can be carried out using crowdsourcing, taking into account the behavior, experience, and personal characteristics of analysts and experts. The author used the method of scientific proof of the conclusions and results of the work. The main result of the research presented in the article is the author’s proof of the possibility and necessity of using crowdsourcing when performing expert assessment procedures for the effectiveness of using municipal treasury property.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:cvt:journl:y:2025:id:1112
DOI: 10.24182/2073-6258-2025-24-1-11-16
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.scinotes.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1112/893
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24182/2073-6258-2025-24-1-11-16?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvt:journl:y:2025:id:1112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.