IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvr/ijisrt/202607ijisrt26jul1334.html

Fairness Audit and Debiasing of Machine Learning Models for Sepsis Mortality Prediction Across Demographic Subgroups: A Multi-Metric Study with Accuracy–Fairness Tradeoff Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Francis Mawutor Amuyao

  • Isaac Tosin Adisa

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models for sepsis mortality prediction are increasingly deployed in intensive care units, yet performance across demographic subgroups remains poorly evaluated, and algorithmic disparities can directly exacerbate health inequities in critical care settings. We trained three ML models—logistic regression (LR), XGBoost, and a multilayer perceptron (MLP)—on a 10,000-patient cohort calibrated to published MIMIC-IV sepsis statistics, and performed a four-metric fairness audit (equalized odds difference [EOD], demographic parity difference, predictive parity gap, and subgroup calibration error) across race/ethnicity, sex, and insurance type. Per-group threshold optimisation was applied for debiasing, and an accuracy–fairness Pareto tradeoff was quantified.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis Mawutor Amuyao & Isaac Tosin Adisa, 2026. "Fairness Audit and Debiasing of Machine Learning Models for Sepsis Mortality Prediction Across Demographic Subgroups: A Multi-Metric Study with Accuracy–Fairness Tradeoff Analysis," International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), IJISRT Publication, vol. 11(07), pages 3834-3839, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cvr:ijisrt:2026:07:ijisrt26jul1334
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul1334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijisrt.com/fairness-audit-and-debiasing-of-machine-learning-models-for-sepsis-mortality-prediction-across-demographic-subgroups-a-multimetric-study-with-accuracyfairness-tradeoff-analysis
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul1334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvr:ijisrt:2026:07:ijisrt26jul1334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rahul Goyel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijisrt.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.