IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvg/stlaju/v4y2025i5p56-65.html

Conflict and Coordination Between Data Sovereignty and Digital Trade Liberalisation: An Analysis of Cross-Border Data Flow Policies in China and the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Xun Zhu

    (National University of Singapore, Singapore)

Abstract

The digital economy faces a fundamental contradiction between the principles of digital trade liberalisation and the emerging demands of data sovereignty. This study analyzes this tension by conducting a comparative examination of the data governance frameworks of China and the European Union (EU). It contrasts China’s state-centric approach with the EU’s human rights-oriented model. The analysis demonstrates how these divergent models create significant non-tariff barriers to digital trade, clashing with the international liberalisation principles. It proposes several pathways for coordination to mitigate this tension. These include philosophical alignment on global justice, perfecting international trade rules with clear security exceptions, and strengthening regulatory cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xun Zhu, 2025. "Conflict and Coordination Between Data Sovereignty and Digital Trade Liberalisation: An Analysis of Cross-Border Data Flow Policies in China and the EU," Studies in Law and Justice, Pioneer Academic Publishing Limited, vol. 4(5), pages 56-65, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cvg:stlaju:v:4:y:2025:i:5:p:56-65
    DOI: 10.56397/SLJ.2025.10.07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/slj/article/view/1489/1393
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/SLJ.2025.10.07?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvg:stlaju:v:4:y:2025:i:5:p:56-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.