IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvg/stlaju/v1y2022i2p9-16.html

Study on the Legal Consequences of Revocation of the Appellate Award in the Internal Appellate Mechanism for Arbitration

Author

Listed:
  • Yongxin Li

    (Master of Private International Law, Wuhan University Law School)

Abstract

The traditional principle of finality in arbitration has certain drawbacks, and the huge risk costs it may lead to make some international commercial parties no longer use arbitration as their first choice for dispute resolution. However, the appellate mechanism for arbitration is not yet well developed, and the legal consequences of revocation of the appellate award need to be further clarified. In this article, I will analyse the academic opinions in China and abroad, and discuss the validity of the appellate award and the original award, the validity of these two kinds of awards after the appellate award is set aside, and the understanding of the principle of “non bis in idem” after being revoked, so as to draw conclusions on how to determine the validity of the arbitration award after the appellate award is set aside under different circumstances. Based on analysis above, my suggestion is that the same dispute after the revocation of the appellate award should be arbitrated by entering into a new arbitration agreement or by bringing a lawsuit.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongxin Li, 2022. "Study on the Legal Consequences of Revocation of the Appellate Award in the Internal Appellate Mechanism for Arbitration," Studies in Law and Justice, Pioneer Academic Publishing Limited, vol. 1(2), pages 9-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cvg:stlaju:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:9-16
    DOI: 10.56397/SLJ.2022.12.02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/slj/article/view/85/64
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/SLJ.2022.12.02?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvg:stlaju:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:9-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.