IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvg/jrsshu/v3y2024i11p64-71.html

From Qi to the Ultimate Pursuit — The Similarities and Differences Between Zhuangzi and Mencius

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Long

    (Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China)

Abstract

In ancient China, qi 氣 is an important philosophical proposition. Zhuangzi believed that qi is a substance that fills the universe and is in constant motion, unbound by any constraints. In contrast, Mencius leaned more towards the moral implications of qi in his explanations. Both Zhuangzi and Mencius derived the concept of xing性in accordance with their respective understanding of qi, discussing the ultimate pursuits of life. Zhuangzi emphasized the pursuit that is internalized within the heart, advocating that individuals align with nature and seek inner freedom, whereas Mencius advocated an externalized approach through benevolence and righteousness, participating in politics to achieve a harmony between the individual and society. These two pursuits reflect their unique understandings of human nature and society, which still hold profound relevance in contemporary times.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Long, 2024. "From Qi to the Ultimate Pursuit — The Similarities and Differences Between Zhuangzi and Mencius," Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, Pioneer Academic Publishing Limited, vol. 3(11), pages 64-71, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cvg:jrsshu:v:3:y:2024:i:11:p:64-71
    DOI: 10.56397/JRSSH.2024.11.08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/jrssh/article/view/1084/985
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/JRSSH.2024.11.08?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvg:jrsshu:v:3:y:2024:i:11:p:64-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.