IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvg/jrsshu/v2y2023i2p24-32.html

From the Sentencing Recommendations’ Review and Adoption to See the Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment System and the Reform of the Trial-Centered Litigation System

Author

Listed:
  • TAN Ruolin

    (School of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 100088)

Abstract

The essence of the inherent conflict between the Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment system and the Trial-Centered Reform of the Litigation System is the distribution of litigation and trial power, which is reflected in the review and adoption rate of the sentencing recommendations submitted by the procuratorates in cases involving Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment. Since the Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment system formally came into legal effect, according to the statistics from China’s judicial practice, the adoption rate of sentencing recommendations by the procuratorates is far less than expected, which has led to some questions about the implementation and development of the two systems. Through the three-dimensional analysis of the conflict of powers of prosecution and trial, the author hopes to find a balance between the two values, to build a healthy interaction between prosecution and trial, to improve the rate of adoption of sentencing recommendations, and promote the implementation of the two systems further, so that make every citizen feel the fairness and justice in individual cases.

Suggested Citation

  • TAN Ruolin, 2023. "From the Sentencing Recommendations’ Review and Adoption to See the Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment System and the Reform of the Trial-Centered Litigation System," Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, Pioneer Academic Publishing Limited, vol. 2(2), pages 24-32, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cvg:jrsshu:v:2:y:2023:i:2:p:24-32
    DOI: 10.56397/JRSSH.2023.02.03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/jrssh/article/view/139/115
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/JRSSH.2023.02.03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvg:jrsshu:v:2:y:2023:i:2:p:24-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.